TL;DR
The California Public Utilities Commission approved a community solar program that industry advocates criticize as unworkable. Critics argue it fails to promote new projects and delays affordable clean energy for ratepayers.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) this week finalized its community solar program, despite ongoing criticism from solar advocates who describe it as “unworkable” and likely to fail in delivering new projects or affordability. The decision, which was made without support from industry advocates, sets the program’s structure using existing tariff frameworks, critics say it perpetuates delays and inefficiencies, and leaves California behind other states in deploying community solar solutions.
The CPUC approved the community solar program as written, utilizing the existing Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT) pricing structure, which aims to limit non-participating customers’ costs to the avoided wholesale electricity price. This move comes after the CPUC rejected a proposal from solar advocacy groups that would have supported more proactive development of community solar projects. Industry advocates, including Californians for Local, Affordable Solar and Storage (CLASS), argue that the current framework has resulted in zero new projects, the forfeiture of $250 million in federal Solar for All funding, and significant delays in providing affordable energy options.
State legislation, including AB 2316 passed in September 2022, mandated utilities to develop community solar programs that enable customer participation in offsite renewable generation. Last year, legislators attempted to strengthen this framework through new bills, such as AB 1813, aiming to guarantee affordability for low-income households and expand program reach. However, the CPUC’s recent decision effectively maintains the status quo, critics say, and fails to address longstanding barriers to project development.
Critics argue that the CPUC’s approach favors utility control and ignores the potential for community solar to provide cost savings and energy equity. They point out that other states have successfully implemented community solar programs that deliver tangible benefits to consumers, whereas California’s current policy has yet to produce a single project, critics claim.
Impact of CPUC’s Decision on California’s Solar Future
The CPUC’s approval of the community solar program despite industry opposition raises concerns about California’s ability to meet its clean energy and affordability goals. Critics say the decision delays the deployment of community solar projects, which are essential for expanding access to renewable energy for renters and low-income households. The failure to support project development could hinder California’s progress toward its climate commitments and leave ratepayers without the cost savings and energy options promised by legislation.
Furthermore, critics warn that the continued reliance on utility-controlled frameworks may stifle innovation and competition in the solar market, slowing down the transition to cleaner energy sources. The decision also risks California falling behind other states that have successfully implemented community solar initiatives, potentially impacting the state’s reputation as a leader in renewable energy policy.
ECO-WORTHY 10KW Output 9.36KWH Off Grid Solar System Complete Kit for Home:12pcs 195W Solar Panels(2340W)+10KW 120V/240V Inverter (UL 1741)+ 2pcs 48V 100AH Lithium Batteries(UL 1973&UL 9540A)
[Ideally Output of 9.36KWH] The power of 9.36KWh per day under 4 hours full sunshine by the 2340W…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background on California’s Community Solar Efforts
California’s community solar program was mandated by AB 2316 in September 2022, which required large utilities to develop programs enabling customer participation in offsite renewable generation. The legislation aimed to increase access to solar energy for renters, low-income households, and small businesses, while promoting grid reliability and affordability. Despite the legislative mandate, efforts to implement the program have faced delays and opposition from industry advocates and some utilities.
In 2024, the CPUC rejected a proposal from solar advocacy groups that would have supported more aggressive development of community solar projects, citing concerns about program structure and costs. Last year, legislators attempted to pass AB 1813, which would have further expanded and strengthened the program, including provisions for affordability for low-income customers. The current decision marks the latest development in a long-standing debate over how best to implement community solar in California, with critics arguing that the current framework has failed to produce results.
“The CPUC’s decision effectively maintains the status quo, which has resulted in zero projects and significant delays.”
— an anonymous researcher
ECO-WORTHY 10KW Output 9.36KWH Off Grid Solar System Complete Kit for Home:12pcs 195W Solar Panels(2340W)+10KW 120V/240V Inverter (UL 1741)+ 2pcs 48V 100AH Lithium Batteries(UL 1973&UL 9540A)
[Ideally Output of 9.36KWH] The power of 9.36KWh per day under 4 hours full sunshine by the 2340W…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Unresolved Questions About Future Program Implementation
It remains unclear whether future legislative efforts, such as AB 1813, will succeed in significantly changing the community solar landscape in California. Details about how utilities and regulators will address project backlog, funding, and affordability for low-income households are still emerging. Additionally, the impact of the CPUC’s decision on actual project development and consumer participation has yet to be observed.
community solar subscription
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Next Steps for California’s Community Solar Policy
Legislators are expected to continue efforts to pass bills like AB 1813, which could alter the program’s structure and funding. Industry advocates plan to monitor the CPUC’s implementation and push for reforms that promote project development and affordability. The state’s progress toward deploying community solar projects and delivering benefits to ratepayers will be closely watched in the coming months.
offsite solar energy solutions
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Why did the CPUC reject the advocacy proposals for community solar?
The CPUC rejected the proposals, citing concerns about program structure and costs, and chose to proceed with the existing tariff framework instead.
What are the main criticisms of the CPUC’s decision?
Critics argue it perpetuates delays, benefits utilities over consumers, and has resulted in no new projects or affordable energy options for ratepayers.
How could legislation like AB 1813 change the current situation?
AB 1813 aims to expand and strengthen community solar, including provisions for low-income affordability, which critics say could finally enable project development and consumer benefits.
What is the significance for California ratepayers?
The decision impacts the availability and affordability of renewable energy options, especially for renters and low-income households, and influences California’s climate and energy goals.
When might we see new community solar projects in California?
Project development depends on legislative progress and regulatory reforms; it is uncertain when new projects might begin to be built.
Source: Solar Power World
